The cut is because it is greater in concealment, and whoever takes care of the appearance of what the truth has revealed, because the truth is more familiar with himself than his servant with it, and exalted himself in another station, did not want to control the truth with his mind, and said returning to it is more important than jealousy over him, for the truth gives that he is jealous of him, not on him according to Sharia. Except for the one who does not find the sandals and the sole is a protective one that does not cover, and he says to cut off the slippers, which is better

( It arrived in the chapter of those who wore them, cut off with the presence of the sandals )

Whoever says ransom owes him, and whoever says ransom does not owe him

[ Knowing God by way of news is higher than knowing by way of sight ]

When the slipper combined with the sandal to protect from the harm of the lower world, and the slipper increased the protection from the harm of the higher world, in terms of what they are worlds with a common meaning, and the significance accepts the resemblance and is the harm that relates to it. Therefore, knowledge of God by the path of news is higher than knowledge of God through consideration, for the path of news is in knowledge. God only came with what His Essence, the Exalted, is not in the knowledge of the beholder, so knowledge of mental evidence is negative, and news evidence is affirmative, negative in affirmation, and negative in affirmation. Adjust to slippers

[ Everything that the Sharia is silent about is wellness .]

If the name of the slipper is removed by definition and it is not attached to the degree of the sole to cover the appearance of the man, then he is neither a slipper nor a shoe, then he is silent about it as he who walks barefoot. It is true that he gives what he does not give at all, so it is necessary to take it, for he did not cut them apart except to attach them to the level of the sole, except that in it there was a covering over the leg, so the sandal separated and did not cover the leg, so the difference between the slippers is neither the slippers nor the soles, and it is close to the slippers and close to the soles, and we made it a protection on the top due to the presence of wiping on the top of the slippers. If there is no harm in that in some way, he would not wipe the top of the slippers in ablution, because the creation of purity is a signifier of an existential reason that he wants to remove by creating that purification and purity that is not an accident has this ruling, for it is pure in origin, not from purification

[ The knower according to what is happening in it and what will be his scene ]

A person in this matter if he knows according to what is being held in it and what his scene will be. If his witnesses give him to wear with the presence of sandals, beware of the impact of height on the surface of his feet It was not permissible for him to wear the cut, since the principle in using that was the lack of sandals, so revealing and announcing was outweighed by concealment and secrets in the knowledge of God in the highest public, which is the science of integrity, legitimate and reasonable.

[ Degrees of integrity in the mind ]

For transcendence has degrees in the intellect. What is below it is exaltation by analogy, and the highest in the mind is transcendence without analogy, and there is no way for a creature to do it except by returning knowledge in it to God Almighty. Explanation of the physical equator from the spatial throne by disassociating it from it to the analogy with the sultanic equator that occurred, which is the seizure of the greatest surrounding place or the king, and he continued to be exalted from the analogy, so he moved from the analogy to another innovator above him in rank. There is nothing like it, do you not see them martyred in the mental exaltation of the level, according to the poet?

Bishr has settled over Iraq *** without a sword and blood shed

And where is the equalization of humankind over Iraq from the ascension of truth over the throne? The false ones have lost. Where is this soul from his saying that there is nothing like it? So human equal is one of the number of things. Abu Saeed al-Kharraz and his likes believed when they said that only God knows God.

Longing is known only to the one who suffers from it *** and the pain is only known to the one who suffers from it

( It arrived in the chapter on the people s disagreement about the saffron dress of Muharram after they agreed that it should not be worn dyed with roses or saffron )

Some of them said, There is nothing wrong with wearing saffron, for it is not good. Some people said, It is good, and the ransom must be paid if he wears it.

[ Tayyib to the one who is forbidden is not permissible ]

Perfume is for the one who is forbidden to us, and I mean perfume, not the presence of perfume with which he is perfumed before the contract of ihram and accompanied it is not permissible unless he wants to replace it and before it becomes permissible. He, peace and blessings of God be upon him, only came from what Aisha said, so he touched on the possibility that it was about a matter that she understood from the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, in that which was required by her consideration and understanding, or from an explicit text from him to her in that, and we saw that he had forbidden perfume for a period of time.