Fasting is abandonment and abandonment is what has an existential characteristic that occurs, for abandonment is not an existential thing that occurs because it is a negative epithet and the taste contradicts it.

[ Drink Tajl center ]

As for the drink, it is a transcendental medium, and the medium is confined between two extremes for those who are in the middle of them, and the restriction determines what is restricted, and fasting is a divine attribute. The one who is not manifested to him and the one who is not in the fasting person has no eye because fasting for God is not for us and I am the one who is called by it.

[ Having pleasure in intercession ]

As for intercourse, it is due to the presence of the pleasure of intercourse. Each one of the spouses has a pleasure in it. Each one is similar to the other in intercourse. That is why it is called intercourse because the two spouses meet. or one of them fasting

( It arrived in the chapter on what enters the stomach and what is not food )

They differed about what enters the stomach from things that are not food, such as pebbles and other things, and what enters the stomach from outside the outlet of food and drink, such as a syringe, and what enters the inside of the organs and does not return the stomach, such as returning the brain and not returning the stomach.

( Arrived in the chapter of consideration )

The sharing of the wise people with ideas, the people of God, in what opens to them from the knowledge of disclosure through solitude and exercise through the way of looking, and the people of God Almighty with them through the way of faith and they came together in the result. And the path is different, so that is a consideration for the one who said that he breaks his fast

[ What the Perfect Manifestation must witness ]

As for considering the inner parts of the body apart from the stomach, then it is if the fasting person is in a divine presence, then he is in an ideal presence, such as his saying I worship God as if you see Him.

Street saying I worship God as if you see him

So he abandons his knowledge and taste and descends to this level as literature with the law and a reality of revealing, then he may or may not break his fast and says: I am a collection of different facts and in what keeps me as I am, and in what you require watching this revelation while I am an imaginary or an imaginary, so he knows that the truth has been asked of me That we witness him in this presence from this reality and from every reality in me, so this perfect manifestation of me must be this reality that requires it and maintains what I am from the fact that there is no imagination or imagination.

( Arrived in the Qibla chapter for the fasting person )

Among the scholars of Sharia were those who permitted it, and some of them hated it at all, and some of them hated it for the young man and permitted it for the sheikh.

( consider this chapter )

This issue is the opposite of the issue of Musa, peace be upon him, for he asked to see after what he had spoken of, for witnessing and speaking do not meet except in the manifestation of the Barzakh, and he was the shrine of Shihab al-Din Omar al-Suhrawardi, who died in Baghdad, may God have mercy on him. Here I learned that the sight of it is an isthmus, it must be otherwise, it is not, and the kiss is from the turnout, and the acceptance of the frankness from the presence of the tongue. The place of Moses I tasted in the place where Moses, peace be upon him, tasted it, except that I tasted it in dirt in the sand as much as the palm, and Moses, peace be upon him, tasted it in his need, and she asked for fire for his family, so I rejoiced where water was

[ Consideration of the one who dislikes the Qiblah for the fasting person and who permits it ]

Rather we said that if he spoke he did not witness it, because the soul seeking to comprehend the speech is absent from the view, then he is in the position of one who hates the qiblah, as the fasting person is the one who is watching because fasting has no likeness and witnessing has no likeness. Except from the station of the manifested to him, but if the transfiguration is in a position other than the one that is manifested to him, it is not valid to ask for anything other than what is in it, because witnessing the truth is an annihilation and with annihilation a request is not imagined, for the pleasure is closer than the request to speak for the same scenes, and with this, the spectator does not enjoy in the state of witnessing