Faith is the one who worships God whom the Legislator described, and the sick believer in his faith is the one who worships God whom reason has indicated and nothing else. and Dakhla

( Connected in the chapter on the causes that invalidate the prayer and require it to be repeated )

They agreed that whoever violates one of the conditions for the validity of the prayer deliberately or by forgetting, it is obligatory for him to repeat it, such as facing the Qiblah and purification.

( consideration )

Conditions of happiness, monotheism, I mean not eternity in Hellfire, and conditions for deliverance from every destructive station in the hereafter. It is not valid to escape from it except with its existence without looking at the mercy that encompasses all, for the heart of the gnostic is broader than God s mercy, and if his existence is from God s mercy, then God s mercy is impossible. Nine of God, for God is not characterized by being merciful, and the heart of the one who knows God seeks the truth as it is

He said, The heart of my faithful servant is sufficient for me

God s mercy encompasses everything, and the heart of the knowing servant encompasses truth and mercy that encompasses everything and encompasses everything.

( Praying in the chapter on the event that interrupts the prayer, does it require repetition or is it based on his previous prayer )

The majority of them are of the view that it is not built either in the event or in anything else that interrupts the prayer except in the nosebleed only, and some of them said, nor in the nosebleed as well. Purity or it is one of the events that interrupt the prayer and does not invalidate the purity.

( Mind that came in )

The interrupter of monologue and the barrier between you and the witnessing, does it affect the hereafter when seeing, so that it is like the separation between the two arenas, or does it not affect and the vision and watching are not connected? The one who does not build, even if the categorical one sees a reason and relies on it, then he reaps the fruit of what preceded him of soliloquy before the emergence of this causal categorical, and he is undoubtedly in the same position as the one who builds

( Arrived in the prayer class )

To a sutrah or to something other than a sutrah, and something passes in front of him. Does he interrupt the prayer on him or not, so it is said that nothing interrupts the prayer, and someone says that a woman, a dog, and a donkey cut it off if it passes between his hands or between him and his jacket, which I say is that the passer-by is to be obeyed and that the worshiper is commanded. That he prevents him from passing and pushes him as much as he can. If he does not do that and does not push him, then the worshiper is sinful, and the prayer is valid in every way, and the limit that he must pay on his behalf is the limit of the place of his forehead in his prostration from the ground. Paying him or fighting him, and the sin is related to the passer-by in the fate that is called in his hands by the Arabs, since the legislator did not specify anything about that

( consider that )

The truth is the qiblah of the servant, so whoever passes between God and his servant by himself, not by his Lord, then his mind is turned on him, and the worshiper who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is praying is to warn him and turn him away from seeing himself in that, then he is commanded to give advice to God and his messenger and to the common people of the Muslims and their imams and to all the people at all. In any case, the call to prayer is correct, even if he is a sinner. If the passer-by is a thought, it comes to him in the event of his prayer between him and his Lord. If he is in a correct prayer in his heart, then it is impossible for him to pass by it other than what is in it according to the verse in which it is or the remembrance. As for other than that, he does not find an outlet. He was neglectful of himself and thoughts passed, so he is not devoid at the beginning of the contract and conjure. If he is present with his Lord, he does not care about what occurred to him, and his prayer is valid, for he is present with himself. He is calling out to his Lord. Everything emanates from the truth when he is in a state of monologue between him and his Lord, like Abu Bakr, so his prayer inwardly is valid.