Detailing the chapters of this section, God Almighty, willing, so who is he who says that this purity, I mean the purity of soil instead of the major, and who says that it does not replace the major, but rather ascribing the words minor and major to purity to the generality of purity in the washing of all the body and especially it with some organs in ablution, the minor event is the cause of ablution The biggest event is every event that requires ablution

(arrived) his consideration in the subconscious

Every event that undermines faith must be washed with water, which is the renewal of faith in knowledge. He removed his faith in the sword or good thought, so he is doing tayammum with dust when he loses water or is unable to use water

[ Tradition in Faith ]

This is according to the doctrine of those who see that tayammum is also a substitute for greater purity, and he sees tayammum for the one who is junub. As for the view of those who see that the one who is junub does not do tayammum, such as Ibn Masoud and others, he is the one who does not see imitation in faith. Rather, it is necessary to know God and what must be known to him, and it is permissible and impossible with theoretical evidence, and a group said it of the speakers

[ An analogy in legal rulings ]

And as for his being I mean tayammum instead of minor purity, it is that he defames an event in a specific issue, not in faith, because there is no text from the Qur an or the Sunnah or unanimity in that. This is an issue in which there is no verdict pronounced on it, and another issue in which the ruling is uttered from the Book, the Sunnah, or the consensus

[ Fiqh in religion is not analogy in rulings ]

And our doctrine is in our saying that tayammum is not an alternative, but rather it is a specific legal and specific purification for a specific situation whose law, which legislates the use of water for this specific act of worship, which is God Almighty and His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace. The ruling on this issue enters into the whole of that speech, which is jurisprudence in religion. The Almighty said that they may understand the religion and does not need an analogy in that. An example of that is a man who hit his father in some or what he was. The people of analogy said there is no text in us in this issue, but when the Almighty said, do not say to them a thousand And do not rebuke them, we said, so if the prohibition of reprimanding is mentioned, and it is little, then hitting with a stick is more severe, so it was a warning from the lawgiver from the lowest to the highest, so it is necessary to compare it to him, for the reprimand and hitting with the stick combine both harm. It is permissible to command it, nor to control, especially in such matters. If no other than this was mentioned in the pronunciation of the law, we would not have required this analogy, nor did we say it, nor did we add it to the shortening. Rather, we judged by what was mentioned, which is the Almighty s saying, and to the parents kindness, so the most beautiful speech, so use We hoped from this summation to rule in everything that is not good, and to strike with a stick what is from the kindness that is enjoined from the Sharia in our treatment of our fathers.

[ The debt is complete, and it is not permissible to increase it by analogy, just as it is not permissible to decrease it by means of delaying it. ]

The debt is complete, and it is not permissible to increase it, just as it is not permissible to decrease it, so whoever hits his father with a stick, what is good to him, and whoever does not do good to his father, he has disobeyed what God commanded him to treat his parents with. It has been proven that disobeying parents is a major sin, so we said that purification with dirt, which is tayammum, is not a substitute, rather it is legitimate as water has been prescribed, and it has a special description in work. What has replaced the substitution of it in the act, and God says the truth and He guides the way

( Chapter on Whom This Purification Is Permitted )

[ Tayammum for the sick and the traveler if they lack water ]

Sharia scholars agreed that tayammum is permissible for the sick and the traveler if there is no water and we have no water, or not using water when there is a disease that he undertook for fear that it will increase the disease or die due to the text of that.

( Received it in the subconscious )

The traveler is the one who studies the evidence, for he is a traveler with his thought in the places of his premises and the way of arranging them until he results in a ruling on the required issue.

[ The imitator, the one who looks and the one who reveals himself ]

And we said before that the imitator in faith is like one who performs tayammum with dust, because dust is not in purity, I mean cleanliness, like water.