A purifying drink was not a prerequisite for ablution with it, and it is inevitable that it may be possible to purify the garment from impurity with it, for God has not prescribed for us the purification of prayer when there is no water except for tayammum with dirt in particular.

( The ruling of the sub has arrived on this )

As for the ruling of the batin in this, the one standing in his knowledge of God is based on the legitimate evidence which is a branch in denoting the rational evidence, which is the origin. The two evidences and the imitator are not able to separate the two evidences, so as it includes mixing the rational evidence, it is permissible to take it in the evidence, so it is permissible to perform ablution with date wine. He called it a drink and removed the name of water from it, so he understood, and God speaks the truth and He guides the way.

( doors that invalidate ablution )

[ The invalidator of ablution is everything that undermines the evidence ]

The ruling on that in the subconscious, I mean, that invalidates ablution is that everything that undermines rational and legal evidence in the knowledge of God. Knowledge of God, of His monotheism, of His Most Beautiful Names, and what God must be upon, and what is permissible and what is impossible to reason, unless a mutawatir report is reported in a book or a Sunnah, for all of this contradicts the purity of the heart with the knowledge of God, His monotheism and His names.

( Chapter: Breaking the ablution with what comes out of the body of uncleanness )

[ Scholars differ on sleep ]

Sharia scholars differed regarding the nullification of ablution with what comes out of the body from the unclean, according to three schools of thought. Health and sickness, and others considered the outsider and the exit as the recipe for exit, and with it I say

( The ruling of the sub has arrived on this )

[ The pronunciation that comes out of a person on the tongue affects faith ]

As for the ruling of these schools of thought regarding the meanings in the subconscious, whoever considers the outside alone and is the one who looks at the expression that comes out of a person, it is the one who affects the purity of his faith, such as if he says in his oath that I am innocent of Islam if it was such and such or it was nothing but such and such, for this and if he is true in his oath He was righteous and did not break his oath, for he does not return to Islam safely. This is what he said, peace and blessings of God be upon him, and the example of someone who speaks a word of God s wrath so that people may laugh at it, he does not think that it will reach what it has reached, and it will plunge into the Fire seventy autumns, and it does not take into account those who came out of it from the believer and the unbeliever.

[ Hypocrisy is the appearance of faith on the lips, and there is nothing in the heart of it ]

And whoever considers the two exits is the hypocrite and the suspicious, so whatever comes out of them will not benefit them in the Hereafter, for the outside may be unclean like blasphemy from uttering it, and it may be impure like faith. Something and it is what the Most High said about them when they said: We believe in some and it is like the emergence of the pure, I mean the one who is not unclean, and we disbelieve in some and it is like the exit of what is impure.

[ The one who knows the truth and denies it unjustly and with superiority .]

As for the one who considers the outsider and the exiting as the description of exit, then I know the outside and the exit, and what remains is nothing but the attribute of exit, so the attribute of exit in purity is like revolting against the attribute of disease, like the one who imitates in disbelief or health, and he is the one who knows the true truth and denies it, then he does not believe. And their selves became certain of it, then he mentioned the reason and said: Unjustly and superiorly, then see what was the end of the corrupters. Part thirty-two.

( Chapter of the ruling on sleeping in invalidating ablution )

( In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful )

[ Scholars differ on sleep ]

The scholars differed about sleep on three schools of thought. Some of those who said that it had occurred made it obligatory to perform ablution in a little and a lot, and who said that it is not an accident, then he did not require ablution from him unless he is certain of the event, so the nullifier of ablution is the event, not sleep, and if he doubts the event, the doubt does not affect