The men of God are called Abd Rabbo

[ Lordship is dependent on two ]

Know that lordship is an additional adjective that is not unique to one of those who are mutually exclusive from the other, as it is dependent on two, and it is not necessary that they should not be different, as they may be different and they may be different. And so are all those who are mutually exclusive, so the ratio of the world to what the realities of some divine names give it is the ratio of those who are mutually exclusive on both sides. The world seeks those divine names and those divine names demand the world as the name of the Lord, the Almighty, the Creator, the beneficial, the harmful, the life-giving, the mortal, the omnipotent, the goat and the humiliating to the likes of these names, and then the divine names that do not seek the world but draw from them. One of the breaths of the world without detail, as it separates between these names that we mentioned above, so the names of Al-Istirwah are like Al-Ghani, Al-Aziz, Qaddus and the like of these names. He is the one who inevitably summons the scholar, or what indicates his integrity, and he is the one who draws from him the qualities of a cosmic deficiency from which the truth is beyond what God has given us. If that is in his knowledge or what God has kept in his absence from that which He did not reveal to us, and the reason for that is because the Almighty did not reveal His names to us except to praise Him, then it is impossible that there should be a scientific name in them at all, because the well-known names do not have praise for the named, but they are the names of the signs of the meanings that are given to them. It is indicated by these meanings, and those meanings are the ones that are praised by the one whose judgment appeared to us by them in us, and he is the one named with their meanings, and the meanings are called by these verbal names, such as the Knower, the Almighty, and the rest of the names. Consider it in terms of itself, for it is not an addition to compound letters and special systems called idiomatically, so understand that the emergence of the image of the eleven rak ahs from the Witr, from which emerged the image of a man from among the men of God called Abd al-Fard

[ Individuality is not intelligible to the equitable except by reasoning of another matter ]

Know that singularity is not intelligible to the equitable except by reasoning of another matter about him. This name is unique to an individual with an adjective that is not in the one who is isolated from it, because if it contains what is right for him to singularly, then he would not be called by the name of the individual, then that which is isolated from him must be reasonable and nothing but intercession. The matter that is unique to the individual is the resemblance to the Oneness and the first of the three individuals. The one is not an individual, for God has been described as unbelief. He who said that God is three, if he said the third of two, he would not be an unbeliever, then He is the third of two, and the fourth of three, and the fifth of four extremes, which is His saying, the Most High, and He is with you wherever he is. Whoever is in His Oneness, He is Almighty the second one, and whoever is in His duality, then He is the third of His duality, and whoever is in His Trinity, He is the Most High, the fourth of three, so He is with the creatures wherever they are. The name invokes several meanings, so it asks for it. I mean the name of the Creator by itself. Each of them has an effect on the creature, not on the Creator. The Creator of these meanings is like a collector in particular, and its effect on the creature is not in it. e

If it was the fourth eye of the four, it would be the same, and each of the four was the same as the fourth for the four, without specification. It must include it, so the fifth of the four includes the four and it does not include it, so he fives it and she does not fifth it, for it is four for itself, and so on in every number. A precession and an odd string intercedes, and it intercedes with the string, so it is said the fourth of the three and the fifth of four, and it is not said of the fifth five, nor the fourth of four, or the tenth of ten. This is an individual standing with the wise, and we do not. So, the individuality is for the one who intercedes for the odd prayer, and for the one who performs the Witr intercession, which is an individual among the wise. If not, it would not be correct to say in the individuality of truth that it is the fourth of three and the sixth of five and less than that and more, and it is an individual in every proportion. We single out the intercession of the witr, and sometimes it is preferable to intercede, which is his saying that there are three secret conversations but He is the fourth of them, and there are no five but He who is the sixth of them.