This revelation and revelation, it includes what he mentioned, such as his saying and your Lord revealed to the bees and an ant said, Oh, you ants, and the hoopoe said to Solomon, peace be upon him, I destroyed what you did not come across. They have the reward for that, right or wrong, and the difference between the right and wrong is the reward.

[ The Eighth Prosecution, which intercedes for the oddity of truth, as He, the Exalted, is a manifestation of it .]

As for the eighth representation, which intercedes for the path of truth, in that God Almighty manifests it to Him and it manifests itself to Him, He looks at Himself in it as perfection and she looks at Himself in Him as perfection. His shadow was the Rahmani, so he set up a throne for him on opposite sides of the throne that is attributed to him by virtue of equating over him, and his example is what the truth described the people of Paradise with, reclining He rises above his reclining, and the perfect person also leans on his Lord in what appears in the person of representation when the truth is hidden in it, so the witnessing and what testifies to the witness and not to another matter, just as in the presence of actions the action is attributed by returns to the creature and the truth is hidden in it, and the action is attributed by breach of habit to God and not to God. The created is because it is outside the ability of the creature, so the truth appears, even if it does not appear except in creation, but creation bends over the existence of the truth, because every fact that makes sense of the truth does not make sense abstract from creation, it requires creation by itself, so there must be reasonableness of truth and creation because that divine truth It is impossible for it to have an archaeological connection to the same right, and it is impossible for it to remain suspended in judgment because the judgment is subjective, so there must be reasonableness of creation, whether it is characterized by existence or non-existence. And in existence is a tree

Evidence of the eye is possible with a seed *** and if there were no seed, it would not have sprouted and then sprouted

My appearance from my proof without an order *** My God, it is impossible when I was

And since the matter is as we have mentioned, then there is nothing in knowledge except intercession, which is the duality of the plural, because the divine realities are many and the realities are in proportion to their value.

If the eye had not been proven, it would not have been witnessed *** nor said be a universe nor was it intended

So the rule of the eye for God is still worshiping *** and the fact that the truth is for the eye is still worshiped

When the truth clothed him with the garment of his being *** and he was missing before the universe in the universe

The rulings were formed in it by the fact that it is *** and it is still a lost and existing carpet

And when the rule of dualism of the known matter appeared in itself, it was not valid except by homosexuality and not other than it, because if it was not an example, that which is generalized by itself, nor the midwife, and only the perfect man or the whole of the world in man. The human being is the one who praised the existence of the truth, and the rule of affirmation does not have this position, for the truth and creation are together in affirmation and not together in existence. The ideal of moderation was the proverb according to the image manifested in it. If it is a spiritual image, it is attributed to it what the spirits are in judgment, and if it is a bodily image, it is attributed to it what are the images of the apparent bodies from the judgment, which is characterized by natural descriptions of changing conditions in anger, contentment, joy, descent and hurry. The truth about himself is a matter, so see what he has proven for which image he is, then judge him by the judgment of what he has for that image and there is only like or not like this ruling of this eighth agency we have fulfilled

[ The ninth prosecution is to appear in the reasonable isthmus ]

As for the ninth representation, it is the appearance in the reasonable isthmus between the two examples, which is the separation between the truth and the perfect human being. What is separated from it is the isthmus, and it is attached to the standing person, so it is with him