Whoever is his companion, then in that case he was sitting with the names in terms of what is indicative of the Essence. Nothing occurred from him except astonishment in particular, as it resembles denial and is not in denial, even if this saying was from someone other than God, he would have commanded the one to remain silent and rebuked him for that. The dead, so Abu Yazid wanted what Ibrahim wanted about how to revive the dead because of the different faces in that, not denying the resurrection of the dead. This statement from Abi Yazid indicated his condition at that time. We decided it in the house before this house, and it is a house that opened the doors as well as Abu Yazid, if he knew that the pious is not the companion of the Most Merciful, but rather he is the companion of the mighty, the great, arrogant, and the pious will be gathered to the Most Merciful to be his companion, and the piety will depart from him, for the Most Merciful is not pious, rather he is the place of greed and greed. Educators and people, but they, may God be pleased with them, are honest and do not transgress their taste in every situation, unlike the common people of God, for they speak about the conditions of others and the special ones, they have no way to do that. For those who say this is their condition, may God be pleased with them, and such a thing does not happen to them except in rare cases due to a necessity that calls for it. And the facts were mixed up, and this is the reason for setting limits on things, and God has cursed those without a lighthouse on the earth

arrived

From this section, God did not combine witnessing and speaking for anyone in the event of witnessing him, for there is no way to do that except for the Divine Transfiguration to be in an ideal form. He said by combining witnessing and speaking, but what was narrated from him more than this, I asked the transmitter, and he did not mention to me the type of transfiguration. An annihilation in which there is no pleasure, and the discourse in a state of annihilation is not correct, because the benefit of the discourse is to be rational, and that is why he said, It is not for a human being to speak to him except by a revelation or from behind a veil. On the authority of its witnesses, the specifics of its existence do not disappear and the limit accompanies it, but we said this because I heard some of the sheikhs say, This is the fortune of mankind. No, the matter is according to what I said, I did not make my mind from this, for he spoke in the explanation of the verse, so what he spoke about was wrong about the taste of the matter, and from here the error occurs, and we know that what God said is all true and that it does not contradict tastes. He who has no knowledge of the status of men says that this speaker speaks something that does not contradict what was brought by the Qur an or Sunnah, but he took it from them and he is an interpreter for them. This is about the taste. Rather, a group of people of the path who have no taste imagine something like this and say that So-and-so speaks from wherever it is mentioned in the divine news and has no other substance. They are on the same path, without a doubt, except that among them are the seer, the blind, and the blind. No one of them says except what his condition has given him, not what the way has given him, nor what the path is upon him in himself, especially the moral behavior, for blindness of hearts is more than blindness of eyes, for blindness of hearts prevents you from the truth and blindness The sight that has never seen its owner is only between you And between the colors there is a special one that has nothing but that, and this blindness comes from veiling, as well as deafness, locking and being