With the one eye and not by the outward appearance, because much is witnessed, not abundance, so abundance is reasonable, and much is present and witnessed. Hence, the ruling on the state of jealousy in things appeared and described as jealousy except for him, and the thing is not other than itself unless the thing is things, then everything is other than the thing. The other and the truth is not a thing, so he does not accept others, and he has been characterized as jealous, and from his jealousy, he has forbidden immorality.

As for the case of jealousy in the truth

It is jealousy that occurs when seeing evil and immorality, and it is the one that characterizes the truth, the Most High, the Messengers, and the righteous believers. Then, if immoralities occurred in the universe, we did not see him rush to take them, neither this world nor the hereafter, so we knew that there is a stronger impediment that prevents that from that. Science is more encompassing than it because it is related to it and to the possibilities, the duties, the impossible, the beings and the non-beings, with what gives evidence that what is infinite does not prefer what is infinite. All of it is in the right of the truth. As for the right of the creature, it is necessary to change the soul, and it is entrusted with it in the truth. It is necessary and blameworthy. He who does not find that among the accountable, he is addressed by changing it from his hand by deed to his tongue by saying to the existence of that in the soul, which is the weakest faith in Time is not in the soul of the jealous, so the state of jealousy is what the jealous finds of the difference in the matter over him in himself when something happens that does not please God, whether it happened from him or from others, but from this characteristic he is infallible, for whoever falls from him what necessitates jealousy and is not jealous, and if he sees it from others Jealousy overtook him. It is not a true divine jealousy. Rather, it is a psychological jealousy in which there is no closeness to God Almighty. This is the true divine jealousy, but many of God s people do not feel it except for those who know the truth with the right to know it. And he is not to be blamed for that, taking a general rule, so is the one from whom there is jealousy in the right of Zaid for a specific act, and if that action occurs from him, he does not find jealousy. That is why we said the owner of this case is more deserving and closer to the description of the divine attribute of jealousy than the one who is absolutely jealous of the right of himself and others, and for this reason he is called infallible or preserved. Nothing happened from him that necessitated jealousy, and he is happy in general, praised in the law, and the other is blamed as he condemns the mighty among the creatures, even if tyranny is a divine description, and so is the case with jealousy. From the secrets of jealousy to rest in me If you are aware of it and do not use it, then you will be miserable, but rather be zealous for God absolutely without restriction

As for the case of jealousy over the truth

It is the concealment of secrets and secrets, and this is the case of the hidden, innocent, blameworthy people whose positions are unknown, so that no divine command is known to them. fulfilled by its master, so this verification prevented them from appearing in the place in which their master was concealed, and they broke out with the common people on what the common people are upon from the apparent acts of obedience that were not customary in the custom to be called by them that they are from the people of God because they did not appear from them what distinguish them from the common in actions as it appeared From some of the saints who violate the customs in circumstances or who follow the change of the evil if it appears a change that distinguishes it from the general change so that it is referred to in it, this is the state of jealousy over the truth

As for the case of jealousy of the truth,

And she embraced him with his guardians, as he concealed them from the rest of his servants, so concealment made them dear to them and granted them knowledge of the ruling of the homeland, so they were described as their master. And as for the saying of some of them in jealousy over the truth, that it be mentioned in the Sunnah of the heedless, so every tongue that mentions it is not unaware, rather it has a correct fruit that the one who remembers, which is the tongue, and if it is not accompanied by an intention of the soul of the owner of that tongue, then he never mentioned Zakir with heedlessness, but that is from His saying the Most High. He does not glorify His praise, but you do not understand their glorification of such people.