From reaching that, then they get the knowledge that then he who does not know then leaves the mark as a mark, then he is distinguished from his creation by a negation, not by proof, and the knowledge of him may be from his being a god, so he knows what the rank deserves, so they make that an attribute of those who did that rank and appeared in it, so their knowledge of what the rank requires is their knowledge of its owner. Since he is the one who is attributed with it, then he is attributed with everything that it should be described with. In fact, he knows that this is knowledge of the rank, not of it, but he knows that there is no more possible in the capacity of the possible than this in the field of consideration and establishing evidence. That is what the matter is upon him, so it is according to what he knows and from the people of the view those who desire this ruling that the owner of the manifestation went to, but he does not have strength in it because he is afraid of being mistaken in that because of lack of taste, so he desires it and does not appear with it. He is dependent on him for everything when that thing appears, and some of them depend on him for things before the appearance of things, and some of them return things to him, so he relies on him after he was dependent on things, and all of this is due to their preparations.

[ The science of static and motion ]

And know that this section includes the science of stillness and movement, that is, the science of stability and residency, and the science of change and transition. The Almighty said, and to Him belongs what is indwelling, i.e. what is proven. Its origin was the acceptance of movement from one state to another on which the adjectives were changed, and the highest did not prove the change, not on a specific adjective, and also since the lack of movement was not valid in a claim that the right added to it, and the movement when the claim was accompanied by that of the one who appeared in it, the Almighty did not say that he has what he moved. The case enters into it from the movers, and the evidence is based on the evidence, not the non-existence, for he has certainty and the world is ephemeral.

The Prophet, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, said when he heard the words of Labid

Is everything but God void?

He said this is the truest house the Arabs have said

And if things exist, then they are in the rule of non-existence, because it is permissible for them to do so. It is not relied upon because it betrays the one who is relied upon. That reliance is due to its association with someone who is not proven, so it does not depend on a newly created person except for divine revelation and information, so our dependence on someone who has the attribute of authenticity is like our dependence on the laws in what we must believe in. This is just as we do not prove on the ruling the evidence of someone who does not move for the permissibility of abrogation, and all of this is a law that must be believed in, for the abrogation is a sign of the expiration of the term of that ruling, followed by another ruling, not that the first is impossible, but rather expired due to the expiration of its term because it is originally linked to a specific period that God knows, and if we do not know we That is, we do not rely on an ordinary, updated cause except with a notification from God that He proves His judgment like the faith with which happiness is established, so it depends on it. with me It is between faith that gives happiness, so happiness is negated by the absence of faith in contrast to knowledge, for knowledge has firmness and omissions do not affect it. That he knows God with the presence of the opposite in the place of heedlessness or sleep, and there is no ignorance after knowledge at all, unless the knowledge has come about by looking at a rational evidence, for like that we do not have knowledge to touch the resemblance to its owner, even if the knowledge agrees, but knowledge is one whose owner does not accept a suspicion, and that is not Except for the knowledge of tastes, that is what we say that it is knowledge, and God speaks the truth and He guides the way.

Chapter Forty Six on Reliance on the World

Because it is the book written on the parchment of existence published in the world of bodies that exist from the name God is apparent

[ Reliance on the One with Divine Knowledge ]

Know that this dependence is not valid unless its owner is a person with knowledge of a divine definition, and that is because the scholar was brought with this word in order to know that we want him to make it a sign. In the Eye of Truth, the Book appears in slavery as a scholar, and manifests it in the apparent divine name. Rather, it appears through it. This is a chapter in which the Truth is distinguished from creation, and that the diversity of images did not affect the apparent eye.